• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • About
    • Maria Campos
  • Services
    • Immigration Law
    • Corporate & Commercial Law
    • Notary Public
      • Apostille Services
    • Real Estate Law
    • Wills & Estates
    • Civil Litigation
    • Family Law
      • Separation & Divorce
      • Property and Debt
      • Family Law Agreements
      • Custody & Access
      • Child Support
      • Spousal Support
      • Adoption
  • Contact
  • Payments
  • Blog
    • Immigration
    • Family Law
      • Separation & Divorce
      • Child Support
      • Spousal Support
      • Family Law Agreements
      • Legal Custody
      • Property & Debt
    • Corporate Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Civil Litigation
    • Wills & Estates
  • Español

Invicta Law

Lawyer & Notary Public

GCMS Notes: Are they useful?

December 20, 2021 By Invicta

GCMS Notes: Are they useful?

IRCC has revealed that they use a notes generator: Chinook to help an officer refuse temporary resident applications. After an Officer chooses to refuse a file, they are provided access to this tool to help choose the reasons. Officers are not required to disclose all the reasons of a refusal, but only to choose the more general applicable to the case. I personally advocate for not requesting GMCS notes in every single case and here it is an extensive explanation of why not to do so. In Ocran v. Canada (MCI), IMM-6571-20, an affidavit revealed for the first time the innerworkings of Chinook, an Excel based tool developed in-house by IRCC to allow visa officers to review applications more quickly and the mechanism by which the final decisions are recorded and reasons for decisions are “generated” in this tool.

Requesting GMCS notes may also create a delay in your file (if it’s still active), so think twice or seek legal advice before making the request. Since people learned that GMCS were available, the request of such notes has been abused, which has led to a different issue.

GMCS on Refused Applications

If your application has been refused and you believe that requesting GMCS notes will save your new application, you are definitely mistaken. First, consider if you have a case to be judicially reviewed. Eligible students who have their study permits refused, are being encouraged to Judicial Review so their concerns can be actually heard and not just assessed by a software tool. If your application was not well founded in the beginning of the application, then do not judicial review at federal court level, but prepare properly with the assistance of a lawyer for your next application. Prepare this time to judicial review in the event of a second refusal.

Chinook is being used internally by IRCC to process the applications and once the officer has made up their mind to refuse, choose from a range of reasons into GCMS without providing intelligible and reasonable decision-making. This means that no one will ever see what the actual notes of the officer are. This is one of the main reasons to judicial review the decision. Once the application for leave for judicial review has been filed, IRCC is required to provide written reasons for the refusal. This cannot be the general letter that you received with the refusal.

Currently there are two versions of Chinook: May 2021 and July 2020. They are only used for temporary applications: visitor, study permits, and work permits.

Initially, GMCS was design to provide details, now it’s being feed by another automated tool. This explains why when you look at GMCS the reasons are not coherent with your profile and case.

Procedural Fairness and Basic Principles of Law

Considering the high volume of applications, there are also reasons to believe that officers may have their discretion fettered if they have already approved several (maybe hundreds) of applications in one single day.

There are indicators of risk depending on the visa office you are applying, there are keywords that Chinook red flags and may lead to a visa refusal.

Going to federal court and challenging these indicators and refusals, basically means overturning the engineering decisions made by a tool and arguing procedural fairness factors, as well as other basic principles of Administrative Law.

If you are considering a second try in your application, work with a lawyer to prepare legal arguments along with your submissions. Applying for a visa, study permit or work permit goes beyond just filling out forms, there are principles of the rule of law that must be applied; and also practical tips that align with new procedures and how the software interprets legal disclosures.

Maria Campos is a lawyer with 12 years of experience in immigration law; passionate for Immigration Law and Administrative Law (Regulatory Law), she will be able to assist you with a successful application.

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • WhatsApp

Related Posts


Featured Posts

Importing a Car to Canada from Mexico

June 14, 2022 By Invicta

Thinking about importing a car from Mexico to Canada? There is some leg work involved. Here is what you need to know about the import process.

How Does Express Entry Work?

June 1, 2022 By Invicta

Canada uses a points-based system called Express Entry to rank immigration applications. Applicants with the highest scores are selected from the pool of candidates and invited to apply for permanent residence in Canada. If you are a skilled immigrant who wants to immigrate to Canada, Express Entry may be a great option for you.

Temporary Entry to Canada from US and Mexico Easier Under CUSMA

April 6, 2022 By Invicta

Temporary entry to Canada is easier if you are a citizen of the Unites State or Mexico coming to Canada as a “business person.” The Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA) simplifies the process for professionals, tradespeople, investors, executives, and business visitors who want to work temporarily in Canada.

Reconsideration of a Refused PR Application- Two Stage Principle

February 22, 2022 By Maria

Refusals of immigration applications are common, and it has also become common to apply for reconsiderations, but exactly is a reconsideration of a decision and what is the legal test?

The Federal Court of Canada has recently ruled on a two stage process required by an immigration officer when assessing a reconsideration of a negative decision.

Misrepresentation or Innocent Misrepresentation; What if your Immigration Representative Submits your Application without Giving you an Opportunity to Review?

February 14, 2022 By invictalaw

The general consequence of a finding of misrepresentation in immigration applications is very severe – a five-year ban on admission to Canada. The jurisprudence is settled that s40(1)(a) of the IRPA is to be given a broad interpretation in order to promote its underlying purpose. It is important to note that the exception to this rule is narrow.

Newsletter

Footer

Invicta Law Corporation is based in Vancouver BC, focusing on Canadian Immigration, Family and Corporate Law.

-

88 West Pender St.
Suite 2081
Vancouver, BC V6B 6N9

Consultations by appointment only. Please contact us if you have any questions.

-

[email protected]
Book Appointment
(604) 674-7104

Copyright © 2023 · INVICTA LAW CORPORATION · Privacy Policy · Terms & Conditions · Disclaimer

Visit us on Facebook Facebook LinkedIn LinkedIn Instagram Instagram and Youtube Youtube