• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • About
    • Maria Campos
  • Services
    • Immigration Law
    • Corporate & Commercial Law
    • Notary Public
      • Apostille Services
    • Real Estate Law
    • Wills & Estates
    • Civil Litigation
    • Family Law
      • Separation & Divorce
      • Property and Debt
      • Family Law Agreements
      • Custody & Access
      • Child Support
      • Spousal Support
      • Adoption
  • Contact
  • Payments
  • Blog
    • Immigration
    • Family Law
      • Separation & Divorce
      • Child Support
      • Spousal Support
      • Family Law Agreements
      • Legal Custody
      • Property & Debt
    • Corporate Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Civil Litigation
    • Wills & Estates
  • Español

Invicta Law

Lawyer & Notary Public

Do I Need to Disclose my Withdrawn Criminal Charges to the IRCC?

April 13, 2021 By invictalaw

Do I Need to Disclose my Withdrawn Criminal Charges to the IRCC?

In Immigration Law, the finding of misrepresentation is a serious matter with significant consequences. For immigrants, the law is (unexpectedly) quite broad and raises many issues. In my experience, while there are people who intentionally withheld material facts, there are others who genuinely believed that it was unnecessary to provide such information. 

I am constantly being asked by clients regarding their criminal charges, especially when the charges were ultimately withdrawn. Do they have to disclose the information to the IRCC?

There is interesting case law on misrepresentation and withdrawn charges – Patel v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2017] F.C.J. No. 388 

Mr. Patel was a 26-year-old citizen of India. In Canada, he was charged with operating a motor vehicle while impaired. The charges were ultimately withdrawn. Mr. Patel submitted a TRV application but did not declare the arrest and withdrawn charges. The visa officer determined that Mr. Patel misrepresented and was inadmissible.

At the Federal Court, the determinative issue was the materiality of misrepresentation. Mr. Patel argued that the misrepresentation was not material because he had no criminal record or conviction inside Canada. However, the Federal Court disagreed. 

The Federal Court acknowledged that the jurisprudence indications that a visa officer can still assess admissibility based upon the charges even if there is no eventual conviction [at para 81]. Specifically, withdrawn charges cannot be used against an applicant if the inadmissibility is based on criminality, but can be used if the inadmissibility is based on misrepresentation [at para 82]. Further, the Federal Court wrote that even if the Applicant believed that the lack of a conviction rendered the previous refusal irrelevant, this does not make his misrepresentation innocent [at para 86].

As you can see, it is important to recognize the broad scope of obligation to provide truthful and complete information. The innocent misrepresentation exception is narrow and only applied in exceptional circumstances. 

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • WhatsApp

Related Posts


Featured Posts

Importing a Car to Canada from Mexico

June 14, 2022 By Invicta

Thinking about importing a car from Mexico to Canada? There is some leg work involved. Here is what you need to know about the import process.

How Does Express Entry Work?

June 1, 2022 By Invicta

Canada uses a points-based system called Express Entry to rank immigration applications. Applicants with the highest scores are selected from the pool of candidates and invited to apply for permanent residence in Canada. If you are a skilled immigrant who wants to immigrate to Canada, Express Entry may be a great option for you.

Temporary Entry to Canada from US and Mexico Easier Under CUSMA

April 6, 2022 By Invicta

Temporary entry to Canada is easier if you are a citizen of the Unites State or Mexico coming to Canada as a “business person.” The Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA) simplifies the process for professionals, tradespeople, investors, executives, and business visitors who want to work temporarily in Canada.

Reconsideration of a Refused PR Application- Two Stage Principle

February 22, 2022 By Maria

Refusals of immigration applications are common, and it has also become common to apply for reconsiderations, but exactly is a reconsideration of a decision and what is the legal test?

The Federal Court of Canada has recently ruled on a two stage process required by an immigration officer when assessing a reconsideration of a negative decision.

Misrepresentation or Innocent Misrepresentation; What if your Immigration Representative Submits your Application without Giving you an Opportunity to Review?

February 14, 2022 By invictalaw

The general consequence of a finding of misrepresentation in immigration applications is very severe – a five-year ban on admission to Canada. The jurisprudence is settled that s40(1)(a) of the IRPA is to be given a broad interpretation in order to promote its underlying purpose. It is important to note that the exception to this rule is narrow.

Newsletter

Footer

Invicta Law Corporation is based in Vancouver BC, focusing on Canadian Immigration, Family and Corporate Law.

-

88 West Pender St.
Suite 2081
Vancouver, BC V6B 6N9

Consultations by appointment only. Please contact us if you have any questions.

-

[email protected]
Book Appointment
(604) 674-7104

Copyright © 2022 · INVICTA LAW CORPORATION · Privacy Policy · Terms & Conditions · Disclaimer

Visit us on Facebook Facebook LinkedIn LinkedIn Instagram Instagram and Youtube Youtube